political economy in its production of dogmatics and the loss of acccess to the real

conditions

a condition (turns into the condition the moment it concretizes, when only conditions and manifestations exist in constant conflict) forms as a register that serves to foreclose on the possibility of mystery by optimizing the capacity for channel-signaling to serve the function of limiting dissent rather than navigating it by forming the subject into the shape of critique, where negativity and positivity form a closed loop and drive themselves into a multiplicity of functional tones meant to imprison the original novelty (pure difference without the requirement for repetition/rebirth or without any dominant concept - elaborated later below)

one way a condition can form in light of discourses fragmented due to the decentralization of communication networks, an emergence from within modernity rather than from the style of rhetorics (for example: relativism is a mood but not a structural function, cynicism is a mode in ideology but forced to be productive when you consider its mood, so therefore a "relative cynicism" literally resists the ability for pejorative, it becomes an encompassed conceptual domain - a manifestation rather than a condition), wherein it becomes a total vision and act that swallows even inner passions. no longer has it the character of persistence in the face of irregularity and its madness - this madness is used to enable forces that drive machines of consistency which regulate the language used to immerse oneself in the passions. when the user of this mode enacts a pact to retrieve of disciplines by way of similarity in identity, and to form a shield of resistance to outsider discourses.

the forthcoming manifestation resists the life of thought and succumbs to the inherent paralysis of the hesitance of underwhelming and earth-piling hesitation other than short and quippy retroactive jabs serving to reinforce the bubble of anti-confirmative normativity, which exists itself to enable conformity to a normativity that at all times is both about to become cynical yet exists as a positivist inclination, a grandeur of provocations of series of the real, where the "correct" series is the mirror (of judgement) somewhere in between and yet at the far end, where the truth emerges as the contained exception.

the mode functions by way of an equalizing ideology, the subject of procedural awareness is thrown into the process of the very conflict he envisions, becoming equalized with its own delusions, in a way that conforms it and bounds it to his own discourse, at the same time a dominating discourse, because it requires the obedience of the subject to its power as the only realizable mode capable of forming a series of artificial spooks (spooks not requiring attachment towards disillusioned objectivity but rather the relativistic counterpart that allows for the illusion of a stable set of metaphysical grounding points to enable the movement of conceptual interchangeables in recognizable surroundings) required to further form an attachment to the mental imagery of impressions of expected artificial master-signifiers (master signifiers that function not to refer to themselves as signifiers once more, but to the space between their lacluain emptiness, their denial of their own floating nature, and their "open" self-referral - the assumption of their resting point as subsumed by their own weight) which causes the concept of ideology to equalize with the dominant concept - which differs from a spook on account of its existing non tangible (floating) nature (real, value, other, doom, absolute), which then implicitly serves as a critique of perceived value relativism, where the subject that judges assumes he doesn't contain within him the ability to judge non-deterministically.

the rule of the perceived ideology then serves to form a common sense barrier around concept, where the narrative of the life of thought (the impetus towards free exchanges of speculation) is replaced with the narrative of the completeness of the lack located within the process of the merging between the concept of ideology (the limit of free determination) with the dominant concept.

then, the very language enabled by the floating signifier (the ability for the derridian freeplay of signifiers) is used to defend against the discovery of the life of thought by the newly formed closed interchangeable space, which weaponizes discourse to point to a space where the discourse serves to punish itself by invoking its own lack when considered in the face of the pressure of bodily intensity or the symbolic foundation which serves to enslave the ability to form infinite sets of conceptions by way of removing the speculative drive and replacing it with the integrative drive of onset positivistic defeatism, weaponizing the arrogance of the communicable to point to various fringe cases where the convolution of nuance can be ripped apart by the aggregator (the image of the resistance of the infinite virginity and post-origin form of the reference of opaque structure of the integrated machine of meaning and its ability to create walls with single directions and faces without details

metaphysics thus exists to enable or disable the language that allows it to persist through enabling the language to enable or disable it in artificial loops, where the concept is alienated in face of other forms of alienation (such as the total dismissal of recognition as a possible metaphysical reality in light of the post-proximious nature of abstract belonging - the post historical possibility of this idea as manifest in the "subject" - the envisioned form of act by the determinant of the belonging - meaning the free link - also described as the agent without the need for capacity, which rules over the life of thought)

freedom

the machine of meaning is disabled by the rule of perceived ideology to dislocate the foreclosure and rightly opaque nature of the freeplay of floating signifiers (and the mystery behind the one sided nature of the two sided double-nature) instead abusing neo-spooks (the dominant concept) to rapidfire propulsion (by mechanism of artificial master signifiers) into stasis of the concept and paralysis of the act of speculative thought through its zizekian pseudo-openess (a perceived symptom of modernity also enables the subject to foreclose on the life of thought, but this is an uninspired, accidental and a such, far less symptomatic act). speculative foreclosure describes a loss of "post-capacity" (the false problem of determination as described by the illusion of capacity) to generate non-integrated "original novelty"

mental imagery pertaining to the dominant concept enables the rule of perceived ideology to defend its mode (enabling of conditions) where the universal illusion of the concept is weaponized against the concept of the floating signifier. meanwhile, the sponsored mystery (the mystery of the rule of inference of the ideology, as opposed to the organic opaque mystery) allows for the possibility of the structural failure of the goal of the system (zizeks symptom in lacan - y a de l'un)

meanwhile, the truly organic opaque mystery isnt the cyberspace, it’s the original hidden (meaning, the original novelty, which is both artificially productive and superficially originating, yet also still originally intended to be concealed, so that there is no illusion of choice in its concealment masquarading as a properly new (postmodern) enviornment. just like how the visibility of the inner body is a functionally futile and impractical task (even if "transparency" is achieved, the registered logic of the interface is useless to the quest of engagement with the simulation, and reverting the primary simulation simply means that the engine switches places, even if when its reverted the very laws of the mechanics of the engine themselves change operational wavelenghts).

or in other words, even transparency is simulation because transparency itself is the logic of concealment in the face of a traumatic origin by flipping the law-set whichever side you want it to stay on, so to say, desire doesn’t survive virutal space, it transposes it by commanding that there is an organic mystery of the absolute, rather than seeking to discover it, and digging itself further in either abandonding or re-invoking the real. the real is artificially a part of the simulation, it is both the origin and an element of the virtual space, one that is decipherable (but cruically, one that doesn’t serve as a realm to something else, one that is self-completing, yet one that requires itself to either exist on one side of the origin-point, or to reverse the origin-point and exist at the side originally meant to hold or facilitate the origin point, especially but not limited to the point when the origin itself becomes impossible to determine. for example, if the world was made out of meat yet it required meat to create energy so it could continue to be made out of meat - and there was an infinite amount of meat, but only because this is a core part of the constituent programming of the meat world itself - a programming that is only facilitated by the eating of the self-generating meat - which explains away the question of origin by transposing it as part of its own problem.